An efficient simultaneous reconstruction technique for tomographic particle image velocimetry

382 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Shake-The-Box: Lagrangian particle tracking at high particle image densities (2016, methodology): “The peak accuracy results for MLOS-SMART are in good agreement with the values given for MART by Wie-neke (2013).”
Particle imaging techniques for volumetric three-component (3D3C) velocity measurements in microfluidics (2011, methodology): “Atkinson and Soria (2009) used a simultaneous MART with a multiplicative line-ofsight estimation of possible particle location and achieved a factor of up to 77 increase in speed with the same accuracy.”
Iterative reconstruction of volumetric particle distribution (2013, methodology): “In addition a method is either a direct computation method computing the result in a non-iterative straight way (MLOS, 3D-PTV) or using an iterative reconstruction approach comparing the volume representation with the originally recorded images (MART) trying to find the exact solution to the inverse”
Motion tracking-enhanced MART for tomographic PIV (2010, methodology): “This approach has been brought forward by a sparse object reconstruction and the cross-correlation technique recently proposed by Atkinson and Soria (2009).”
Tomographic PIV: principles and practice (2012, methodology): “The same concept was further elaborated by Atkinson et al (2008) and Atkinson and Soria (2009) where the method is called the multiplicative line of sight (MLOS), followed by a MART method with simultaneous update (MLOS-SMART).”