Community‐Based Premarital Prevention: Clergy and Lay Leaders on the Front Lines*
By Scott M. Stanley, H. Markman, Lydia M. Prado, P. A. Olmos-Gallo, Laurie Tonelli, Michelle St. Peters, B. Leber, M. Bobulinski, Allan D. Cordova, S. Whitton. 2001
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/114687808b58a33c96ac3f7f42b9e44066321a93
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- A Prime Time for Marital/Relational Intervention: A Review of the Transition to Parenthood Literature with Treatment Recommendations (2005, background): “In a recent article focusing on the benefits of premarital education, Stanley et al. (2001) argued strongly for the importance of early intervention/ prevention efforts in reducing the high national divorce rate and associated levels of marital conflict.”
- The Effect of the Transition to Parenthood on Relationship Quality: An Eight-Year Prospective Study (2009, unknown): “Couples in that condition received an average of 5.9 hr of premarital education that reflected the gamut of approached typically conducted by religious organizations (see Stanley et al., 2001, for more details).”
- Making a Case for Premarital Education. (2001, methodology): “● Couples can learn to communicate more positively and less negatively, and some of these effects are clearly measurable up to 5 years or longer (Hahlweg, Markman, Thurmaier, Engl, & Eckert, 1998; Markman, Floyd, Stanley, & Storaasli, 1988; Markman, Renick, Floyd, Stanley, & Clements, 1993; Thurmaie”