NetCoMi: network construction and comparison for microbiome data in R

By S. Peschel, Christian L. Müller, E. von Mutius, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, M. Depner. bioRxiv, 2020

443 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Estimating microbial association networks from high-throughput sequencing data is a common exploratory data analysis approach aiming at understanding the complex interplay of microbial communities in their natural habitat. Statistical network estimation workflows comprise several analysis steps, including methods for zero handling, data normalization, and computing microbial associations. Since microbial interactions are likely to change between conditions, e.g. between healthy individuals and patients, identifying network differences between groups is often an integral secondary analysis step. Thus far, however, no unifying computational tool is available that facilitates the whole analysis workflow of constructing, analyzing, and comparing microbial association networks from high-throughput sequencing data. Here, we introduce NetCoMi (Network Construction and comparison for Microbiome data), an R package that integrates existing methods for each analysis step in a single reproducible computational workflow. The package offers functionality for constructing and analyzing single microbial association networks as well as quantifying network differences. This enables insights into whether single taxa, groups of taxa, or the overall network structure change between groups. NetCoMi also contains functionality for constructing differential networks, thus allowing to assess whether single pairs of taxa are differentially associated between two groups. Furthermore, NetCoMi facilitates the construction and analysis of dissimilarity networks of microbiome samples, enabling a high-level graphical summary of the heterogeneity of an entire microbiome sample collection. We illustrate NetCoMi’s wide applicability using data sets from the GABRIELA study to compare microbial associations in settled dust from children’s rooms between samples from two study centers (Ulm and Munich). Availability A script with R code used for producing the examples shown in this manuscript are provided as Supplementary data. The NetCoMi package, together with a tutorial, is available at https://github.com/stefpeschel/NetCoMi.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology, Periodontics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11185baf061bcaf438e62fc5d1d4be1e4528edf4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Michael Lauber
  2. Sandra Reitmeier
  3. Markus List
  4. Tim Kacprowski
  5. D. Haller
  6. Jan Baumbach
  7. M. Matchado

In Molecular Biology

  1. Michael Lauber
  2. Sandra Reitmeier
  3. Markus List
  4. Tim Kacprowski
  5. D. Haller
  6. Jan Baumbach
  7. M. Matchado

In Periodontics

  1. Sandra Reitmeier
  2. Markus List
  3. Jan Baumbach
  4. M. Matchado

Citations in the corpus