Dynamical friction and galaxy merging time-scales

By M. Boylan-Kolchin, Chung-Pei Ma, E. Quataert. 2007

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The time-scale for galaxies within merging dark matter haloes to merge with each other is an important ingredient in galaxy formation models. Accurate estimates of merging time-scales are required for predictions of astrophysical quantities such as black hole binary merger rates, the build-up of stellar mass in central galaxies and the statistical properties of satellite galaxies within dark matter haloes. In this paper, we study the merging time-scales of extended dark matter haloes using N-body simulations. We compare these results to standard estimates based on the Chandrasekhar theory of dynamical friction. We find that these standard predictions for merging time-scales, which are often used in semi-analytic galaxy formation models, are systematically shorter than those found in simulations. The discrepancy is approximately a factor of 1.7 for M sat /M host ≈ 0.1 and becomes larger for more disparate satellite-to-host mass ratios, reaching a factor of ∼3.3 for M sat /M host ≈ 0.01. Based on our simulations, we propose a new, easily implementable fitting formula that accurately predicts the time-scale for an extended satellite to sink from the virial radius of a host halo down to the halo's centre for a wide range of M sat /M host and orbits. Including a central bulge in each galaxy changes the merging time-scale by ≤10 per cent. To highlight one concrete application of our results, we show that merging time-scales often used in the literature overestimate the growth of stellar mass by satellite accretion by ≈40 per cent, with the extra mass gained in low mass ratio mergers.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1111247f83b7649b839225f2e3a82bcd251bf96a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Somerville
  4. Volker Springel
  5. Thomas J. Cox
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. Simon D. M. White
  8. F. V. D. Bosch

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. R. Somerville
  4. Thomas J. Cox
  5. Volker Springel
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. C. Conroy

Citations in the corpus