The Economics of Technological Diffusion

By Paul Stoneman. 2001

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/11049eed3207cdbcf619066ad62bde7e9d020954

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Shape Complexity and Process Energy Consumption in Electron Beam Melting: A Case of Something for Nothing in Additive Manufacturing? (2017, background): “…to include environmental and social considerations in engineering decisions (Maxwell and van der Vorst 2003), private costs and benefits (accruing to individuals and organizations, as opposed to society) are normally viewed as the determinants of technology adoption decisions (Stoneman 2002).”
Explaining the Diffusion of Renewable Energy Technology in Developing Countries (2013, background): “4 One of the main stylized facts regarding technological change is that new technologies often initially complement older technologies, and only subsequently – and often slowly – re‐ place older technologies (see, for example, Dosi 1997; Gruebler et al. 1999; Mokyr 1990; Rosen‐ berg 198”
Innovation and Diffusion (2004, background): “One promising avenue for modeling is the real options approach suggested by Stoneman (2001b); such a model would yield a hazard or waiting time model rather naturally, while explicitly incorporating the effects of uncertainty on the decision.13 The cumulative distribution for adoption derived from…”
The demand and supply of external finance for innovative firms (2013, background): “Some of these complementary assets can be accessed by collaborating with other organizations (Pisano, 1991; Powell et al. 1996; Ahuja, 2000; Baldwin and von Hippel, 2010) and through the acquisition of new technology in the form of equipment or intermediate inputs (Stoneman, 2001).”
Technology Adoption under Production Uncertainty: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology (2006, unknown): “Stoneman (2002) provides a detailed discussion of the relevant issues in the light of more general technological diffusion models.”
Innovation adoption in agriculture : innovators, early adopters and laggards (2003, unknown): “P. DIEDEREN, H. van MEIJL, A. WOLTERS, K. BIJAK INNOVATION ADOPTION IN AGRICULTURE Econometric results for a choice between being a frontrunner or a laggard (the first level) The regression results of the first level, which are depicted in the upper half of table 3, show that structural characterist”
The intra-firm diffusion of new process technologies (2005, background): “The majority of the extant diffusion literature (see Stoneman, 2001) is concerned solely with inter firm diffusion and intra firm diffusion has been largely ignored, despite its importance.”
The cost of additive manufacturing: machine productivity, economies of scale and technology-push (2016, background): “…that the principal driver behind the adoption of new technologies among the community of potential users is the net benefit resulting from the use of the new technology (Stoneman, 2002a; Foster and Rosenzweig, 2010), which may be directed to develop or sustain competitive advantage (Walsh, 2004).”