Ordinal Conditional Functions: A Dynamic Theory of Epistemic States
By W. Spohn. 1988
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Joseph Y. Halpern
- Judea Pearl
- Didier Dubois
- Ilya Shpitser
- Dan Geiger
- Elias Bareinboim
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Sonja Smets
Citations in the corpus
- Causes and explanations: A structural-model approach (2000, methodology): “There a number of ways of doing this; we choose one based on Spohn’s notion of a ranking function (or ordinal conditional function) (Spohn 1988).”
- Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach. Part I: Causes (2000, methodology): “There a number of ways of doing this; we choose one based on Spohn’s notion of a ranking function (or ordinal conditional function) [Spohn 1988].”
- Logical and algorithmic properties of independence and their application to Bayesian networks (1990, methodology): “Other examples of semi-graphoids include Partial Correlation [5,30], Ordinal Conditional Functions [17, 37 ], Embedded Multivalued Dependencies [9], Qualitative Independence [34], Vertex Separation [30], d-separation [28] and D-separation [15] (hence the name semi-graphoid).”
- Possibility theory and statistical reasoning (2006, background): “Maxitive set-functions or equivalent notions have also emerged as a key tool in various domains, such as belief revision (Spohn [102]), non monotonic reasoning [6], game theory (the so-called unanimity games, Shapley [98]), imprecise probabilities (Walley [109]), etc.”
- Degrees of Belief (2009, background): “One of the most prominent example is Spohn’s ranking theory [112, 113], where so-called ranks in R+ ∪{∞} are assessed to express different gradings of disbelief.”
- Causes and Explanations: A Structural-Model Approach: Part 1: Causes (2013, methodology): “There a number of ways of doing this; we choose one based on Spohn's notion of a ranking function (or ordinal conditional fu nction) [Spohn 1988].”
- A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision (2008, methodology): “, nothing but “Spohn models” as in [49], but with a purely relational description.”