Some Unintended Consequences of Clinical Decision Support Systems

By Joan S. Ash, Dean F. Sittig, Emily M. Campbell, Kenneth P. Guappone, Richard H. Dykstra. American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium, 2007

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10d8f69efaea169c3502ed67e706228e7f600ea1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Joan S. Ash
2. Dean F. Sittig
3. Reed Taylor Sutton
4. M. Chassin
5. Emily M. Campbell
6. J. Osheroff
7. David W. Bates
8. Blackford Middleton

Citations in the corpus

• Grand challenges in clinical decision support (2008, background): “When these organizations are studied, common success factors emerge, from design to communication to clinical practice style to management; yet, this knowledge is frequently not readily available to other organizations seeking to develop CDS programs [22,23].”
• An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success (2020, background): “85 Other medication lists are generated from CPOE orders only, thus still requiring manual con fi rmation that patients are taking the medication.”
• High-Reliability Health Care: Getting There from Here (2013, background): “Unfortunately, in health care, automation is often deployed unsafely, a phenomenon that increases rather than decreases the risk of harm (Ash et al. 2007, 2009; Joint Commission 2008b; Koppel et al. 2005; Sparnon and Marella 2012).”