Co-evolutionary and multi-level dynamics in transitions: The transformation of aviation systems and the shift from propeller to turbojet (1930–1970)

By Frank W. Geels. 2006

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10b64b79d959ef51a84838f0358e15574fb6e60d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Rob P. J. M. Raven
2. H. El Bilali
3. Marko P. Hekkert
4. Audley Genus
5. Anne-Marie Coles
6. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
7. G. Van Huylenbroeck
8. Frank W. Geels

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. H. El Bilali
2. Rob P. J. M. Raven
3. Marko P. Hekkert
4. Audley Genus
5. Anne-Marie Coles
6. A. Mossel
7. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
8. Frank W. Geels

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. H. El Bilali
2. Rob P. J. M. Raven
3. Marko P. Hekkert
4. Audley Genus
5. Anne-Marie Coles
6. Frank J. van Rijnsoever
7. A. Mossel
8. Frank W. Geels

Citations in the corpus

• Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions (2020, background): “…innovations build up internal momentum, changes at the landscape level create destabilising pressure on the regime, and regime destabilisation creates windows of opportunity for radical niche innovations that gather momentum to take centre stage within the system (Geels 2006, 2011; Grin et  al.”
• The Multi-Level Perspective in Research on Sustainability Transitions in Agriculture and Food Systems: A Systematic Review (2019, background): “They are the result of the dialectic interaction processes at the niche-regime-landscape interface; niche-innovations build up internal impetus and a momentum for change, while landscape changes create pressure that destabilizes the socio-technical regime, and the resulting destabilisation of the re”
• Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions (2008, background): “Geels and Schot (2005) identify 5 transition paths plus a path which does not represent a truly ‘radical’ transition, but rather system renewal characterised by constant incremental innovation: Transformation – socio-technical regimes that change without recourse to one dominant technology (e.g. in ”
• Socio-cognitive evolution in niche development: Comparative analysis of biogas development in Denmark and the Netherlands (1973–2004) (2010, methodology): “Note that this conceptualisation of the global niche level is similar to the conceptualisation of regimes used in the multilevel-perspective on technological transitions (Geels, 2004, 2006), which also distinguishes among normative, formal, and cognitive rules.”
• Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions (2017, background): “Boeing, for example was a lagging firm, but came out ahead after the transition from piston-propeller aircraft to jet engines (Geels, 2006).”
• The Organizational Innovation System: A systemic framework for radical innovation at the organizational level (2016, background): “…comprehensiveness of the OIS-concept, insights from other related perspectives and constructs such as the MultiLevel Perspective (MLP) (e.g. Geels, 2006; Geels and Schot, 2007), Business Models (e.g. Bocken et al., 2014; Osterwalder and Pigneur, 2005) and Innovation Adoption (e.g. Hameed…”