Cranial Kinesis in Dinosaurs: Intracranial Joints, Protractor Muscles, and Their Significance for Cranial Evolution and Function in Diapsids

By C. Holliday, Lawrence M. Witmer. 2008

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/107bde82772f4fbf2d1fb35d07a1721b1a6e7b8c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Lawrence M. Witmer
2. R. Martínez
3. Paul C. Sereno
4. Oscar A. Alcober
5. S. Nesbitt
6. R. Irmis

In Paleontology

1. Lawrence M. Witmer
2. R. Martínez
3. Paul C. Sereno
4. Oscar A. Alcober
5. S. Nesbitt
6. A. Turner
7. R. Irmis

Citations in the corpus

• Osteology of Eoraptor lunensis (Dinosauria, Sauropodomorpha) (2012, background): “Proposed models for cranial kinesis in dinosaurs have recently come under criticism for lack of sufficient lines of evidence, including integrated kinematic linkages within the cranium and evidence of musculature that could have driven or controlled intracranial movement (Holliday and Witmer, 2008).”
• Cranial Osteology of a Juvenile Specimen of Tarbosaurus bataar (Theropoda, Tyrannosauridae) from the Nemegt Formation (Upper Cretaceous) of Bugin Tsav, Mongolia (2011, methodology): “rex by Molnar (1991) , Brochu (2003) , Holliday and Witmer (2008) , and Witmer and Ridgely (2009) .”