A comparison of two DNA barcode markers for species discrimination in the red algal family Kallymeniaceae (Gigartinales, Florideophyceae), with a description of Euthora timburtonii sp. nov.
By B. Clarkston, G. Saunders. 2010
85 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1074ca2323d5bdee7607e6fc8a87571fc27932ee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Molecular Biology
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- An assessment of proposed DNA barcodes in freshwater green algae (2010, background): “This locus has not been broadly sampled and recent investigations suggested that it is less variable than other markers, including other chloroplast markers (Sherwood et al., 2008; Clarkston & Saunders, 2010).”
- An evaluation of rbcL, tufA, UPA, LSU and ITS as DNA barcode markers for the marine green macroalgae (2010, methodology): “The UPA primers were p23SrV_f1, p23SrV_r1 (Sherwood & Presting, 2007) and p23SnewR (modified from p32SrV_r1 (Clarkston & Saunders, 2010)).”
- Refinements for the amplification and sequencing of red algal DNA barcode and RedToL phylogenetic markers: a summary of current primers, profiles and strategies (2013, background): “Clarkston and Saunders (2010) reasoned that a repeat near the 3' end of this primer (AGAG) was the cause of this problem and dropped the final nucleotide in designing the modified primer p23SnewR (Fig.”