Tax increment financing, economic development professionals and the financialization of urban politics

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The limits to financialization (2015, background): “, 2011), and from disaster management (Grove, 2012) to (urban) politics (Pacewicz, 2013).”
Reconstituting the state: City powers and exposures in Chicago’s infrastructure leases (2016, background): “Rather than reproduce ‘a false opposition’ (Jessop, 2008) between external financial markets and the local institutions they supposedly subordinate, examining financialisation as a policy project (Christopherson et al., 2013: 353; Pacewicz, 2013) uncovers localities’ construction of the powers that ”
Governing through financial markets: Towards a critical political economy of Capital Markets Union (2018, background): “The engineering of financial instruments and markets as tools of economic statecraft is well documented for the United States, both at the federal (Krippner, 2011; Quinn, 2017) and at the state and city levels (Pacewicz, 2012).”
Demolishing the Present to Sell off the Future? The Emergence of ‘Financialized Municipal Entrepreneurialism’ in London (2018, background): “…across various arenas of local government activity, including urban redevelopment (Rutland 2010), urban infrastructure (Ashton et al. 2016), Tax Incremental Financing (Pacewicz 2013), post-natural disaster redevelopment (Gotham 2016) and debt-led growth strategies (Kirkpatrick & Smith 2011).”