The potential value of indicator groups in the selection of marine reserves

By W. Gladstone. 2002

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/101e24bc6cc31357db0a385133171688206bfa6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Marie Beger
2. Geoffrey P. Jones
3. Greg W. Rouse
4. P. Munday
5. N. J. Fox
6. Stephen D. A. Smith
7. Yann J K Bertrand
8. F. Pleijel

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Geoffrey P. Jones
2. P. Munday
3. B. Sabelli
4. Marie Beger
5. Phil J. Bouchet
6. Paolo Albano
7. Greg W. Rouse
8. N. J. Fox

In Oceanography

1. P. Munday
2. Geoffrey P. Jones
3. Marie Beger
4. Greg W. Rouse
5. N. J. Fox
6. Stephen D. A. Smith
7. Yann J K Bertrand
8. F. Pleijel

Citations in the corpus

• Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: A comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches (2005, background): “However, previous studies in the Australasian region have shown that the heterogeneous nature of fish distributions can make them relatively effective surrogates for other marine taxa (Ward et al., 1999; Gladstone, 2002; Beger et al., 2003).”
• Taxonomic surrogacy in biodiversity assessments, and the meaning of Linnaean ranks (2006, result): “Despite these negative results, other studies show that indicator taxa may be efficient in the designation of conservation area networks selected by complementary strategies (Ryti, 1992; Csuti et al., 1997; Howard et al., 1998; Andelman & Fagan, 2000; Reyers etal., 2000; Gladstone, 2002).”
• Rapid assessment of invertebrate biodiversity on rocky shores: where there’s a whelk there’s a way (2005, background): “…and Cassola 1992; Oliver et al. 1997; Blair 1999; Ricketts et al. 2002), only recently have there been equivalent studies in marine systems (Vanderklift et al. 1998; Ward et al. 1999; Olsgard and Somerfield 2000; O’Hara 2001; Banks and Skilleter 2002; Gladstone 2002; Warwick and Light 2002).”
• The challenge of small and rare species in marine biodiversity surveys: microgastropod diversity in a complex tropical coastal environment (2011, background): “Molluscs are one of few phyla that are routinely considered in marine biodiversity surveys and are even considered to be an ‘‘appropriate indicator group’’ for the rapid assessment of diversity of organisms inhabiting coral reefs (Wells 1998; Mikkelsen and Cracraft 2001; Gladstone 2002; Smith 2005”
• Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: A comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes (2003, methodology): “Similarly, Gladstone (2002) reported that molluscs represent overall species richness better than macroalgae.”
• Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria (2004, background): “With exceptions (e.g. AbenspergTraun et al., 1996; Duelli and Obrist, 1998; Ricketts et al., 1999; Gladstone, 2002), few studies have attempted to answer this essential question, perhaps because of the lack of comprehensive data.”