Auditory scene analysis in animal communication

By S. H. Hulse. 2002

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/101789065e5d84264f87d6d97ed3fb20e77f364a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. H. Brumm
2. Christophe Micheyl
3. M. Bee
4. David A. Luther
5. S. Zollinger
6. A. Horn
7. M. Leonard
8. H. Slabbekoorn

In Ecology

1. Christophe Micheyl
2. M. Bee
3. H. Brumm
4. David A. Luther
5. M. Leonard
6. A. Horn
7. S. Zollinger
8. H. Slabbekoorn

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. H. Brumm
2. Christophe Micheyl
3. M. Bee
4. David A. Luther
5. S. Zollinger
6. M. Leonard
7. A. Horn
8. M. Ritschard

Citations in the corpus

• Animal Communication and Noise (2013, background): “2), sound pattern recognition (Gerhardt and Huber 2002), source localization (Christensen-Dalsgaard 2005), and noise (Brumm and Slabbekoorn 2005) have featured prominently in studies of animal acoustic communication, this is less so for auditory scene analysis (Hulse 2002; Bee and Micheyl 2008).”
• The “Cocktail Party Problem”: What Is It? How Can It Be Solved? And Why Should Animal Behaviorists Study It? (2008, background): “Thus, signaling in groups poses a number of special problems for receivers in terms of detecting and classifying signals (Brumm & Slabbekoorn, 2005; Hulse, 2002; Klump, 1996; Langemann & Klump, 2005; Wiley, 2006).”