Perspective-Taking vs. Mental Rotation Transformations and How They Predict Spatial Navigation Performance.
By Maria Kozhevnikov, Michael A. Motes, B. Rasch, Olessia Blajenkova. 2006
225 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10128ed7eee7942384c69bc28a04d62c0da3d4e5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- A Heuristic Framework of Spatial Ability: a Review and Synthesis of Spatial Factor Literature to Support its Translation into STEM Education (2018, unknown): “…is a significant body of evidence illustrating its association with perspective taking, memory and spatial skills such as spatial relations and visualisation (Allen et al. 1996; Fields and Shelton 2006; Hegarty et al. 2006; Ishikawa and Montello 2006; Kozhevnikov et al. 2006; Weisberg et al. 2014).”
- The Two Forms of Visuo-Spatial Perspective Taking are Differently Embodied and Subserve Different Spatial Prepositions (2010, result): “Verbal “left”/”right” judgments were significantly influenced by angular disparity conform to Experiment 1, our previous findings (Kessler and Thomson, 2010) and to reports by others (Kozhevnikov and Hegarty, 2001; Hegarty and Waller, 2004; Zacks and Michelon, 2005; Kozhevnikov et al., 2006).”