Thinking about Consciousness

By David Papineau. 2002

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/100bc8b724db5d72cbd7d32571eb035b551edbb4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. B. Veillet
2. Peter Carruthers
3. Katalin Balog
4. Elisabeth Pacherie
5. John A. Bargh
6. Henk Aarts
7. David F. Feldon
8. Thomas K. Metzinger

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. B. Veillet
2. Peter Carruthers
3. Katalin Balog
4. K. Stanovich
5. Jonathan Evans
6. Gary Lupyan
7. Keith Frankish
8. Manolo Martínez

In History and Philosophy of Science

1. B. Veillet
2. Peter Carruthers
3. Katalin Balog

Citations in the corpus

• The Case Against Cognitive Phenomenology (2011, background): “…alike) acknowledges the crucial role that these concepts play in the explanation of explanatory gaps, inverted-experience thought-experiments, and so forth (Loar 1990; Chalmers 1996, 2007; Balog 1999; Carruthers 2000; Tye 2000; Papineau 2002; Stoljar 2005; Carruthers and Veillet 2007; Levine 2007).”
• Acquaintance and the mind-body problem (2012, background): “The dualist will say that the gap cannot be closed 38 Papineau 1993a, 2002, 2007 has an explanation he calls the “anti-pathetic fallacy” which he uses to explain what he calls the “intuition of distinctness”, that is, our intuition that physicalism cannot be right.”