National Geophysical Data Center candidate for the World Digital Magnetic Anomaly Map
By S. Maus, T. Sazonova, K. Hemant, J. Fairhead, D. Ravat. 2007
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/100a582ef1f1553c775dfc09f72b2bf36e7e2d9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
- Mioara Mandea
- Nils Olsen
- M. Purucker
- T. Sabaka
- Christopher C. Finlay
- G. Hulot
- L. Tøffner‐Clausen
- B. Langlais
In Molecular Biology
- Mioara Mandea
- Nils Olsen
- G. Hulot
- Christopher C. Finlay
- T. Sabaka
- Alexandre Fournier
- M. Purucker
- L. Tøffner‐Clausen
Citations in the corpus
- Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth‐generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements (2008, methodology): “In producing the NGDC World Magnetic Anomaly Map [Maus et al., 2007b], we merged all of the near-surface data.”
- Building the second version of the World Digital Magnetic Anomaly Map (WDMAM) (2016, methodology): “As for the first version of the WDMAM candidates (Hamoudi et al. 2007; Maus et al. 2007), three data sets of low resolution were added to fill the most important data gaps before constructing the final grid (See Getech data set − index = 46).”
- Kinematics of the South Atlantic rift (2013, methodology): “We combine these data with the interpretations of Max et al. (1999) and Moulin et al. (2009) and the WDMAM gridded magnetic data (Maus et al., 2007) to create a set of isochrons for anomaly chrons M7n young (127.23 Ma),390 M4 old (126.57 Ma), M2 old (124.05 Ma), and M0r young (120.6 Ma) using the…”
- EMAG2: A 2–arc min resolution Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid compiled from satellite, airborne, and marine magnetic measurements (2009, methodology): “[ 11 ] Least squares collocation (LSC) provides a magnetic field estimate for a desired location (e.g., a grid cell center) from all surrounding measurements, based on a covariance model of the magnetic field [ Maus et al. , 2007b, section 2.1].”
- International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation (2015, background): “This issue has important consequences when comparing magnetic surveys carried out at different epochs (e.g., Hamoudi et al. 2007; Hemant et al. 2007; Maus et al. 2007).”
- The Magnetic Field of the Earth’s Lithosphere (2010, methodology): “In particular, the chosen model, MF5 (Maus et al. 2007a), was not completely free of elongated artefacts in the North-South direction.”