Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.

By David I. Perrett, Jari K. Hietanen, M. Oram, P. Benson. 1992

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Deep learning in neural networks: An overview (2014, background): “, 2013) seem compatible with insights about the visual pathway in the primate cerebral cortex, which has been studied for many decades (e.g., Hubel and Wiesel, 1968; Perrett et al., 1982; Desimone et al., 1984; Felleman and Van Essen, 1991; Perrett et al., 1992; Kobatake and Tanaka, 1994; Logothetis”
Fiber Pathways of the Brain (2006, background): “tem to extract meaning from faces, and is distributed in the face-responsive region of the cortex within the superior temporal sulcus (Haxby et al., 2000; Perrett et al., 1992) and in the amygdala (Haxby et al.”
Get real! Resolving the debate about equivalent social stimuli (2009, background): “Indeed, eye gaze is thought to be so important that it has been placed as the primary social attention cue in prominent models of social attention (Baron-Cohen, 1995 ; Perrett, Hietanen, Oram, & Benson, 1992 ).”
Learning to recognize objects (2000, unknown): “Direct attempts to nd the illusive area responsible for face recognition in monkeys has been controversial and till now unfruitful Perrett et al. 1992; Cowey 1992.”
Connectivity profiles reveal the relationship between brain areas for social cognition in human and monkey temporoparietal cortex (2013, background): “Similarly, the macaque STS areas contain neurons that are sensitive to social information conveyed by faces, rather than facial identity (14), and even to other social cues such as others’ body postures and actions (15).”
Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia. (2005, background): “Single-cell studies in the monkey homologue of human STS have identified cells that respond selectively to faces (Baylis et al., 1985; Perrett et al., 1992).”
The social brain in adolescence (2008, unknown): “Single-cell studies in monkeys have identified neurons in the STS that respond selectively to face”
Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. (2000, background): “Electrophysiological data have shown that the cortex in this region contains cells responsive to stimulation in more than one sensory modality [18,19,32] and others sensitive to the sight of biologically meaningful actions, including head, eye and mouth movements [33,34].”
Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. (2002, background): “This sensitivity of the posterior superior temporal sulcus may be analogous to the differential tuning of neurons in the monkey superior temporal sulcus to direction of eye gaze, angle of profile, and expression (Hasselmo et al 1989; Perrett and Mistlin 1990; Perrett et al 1984, 1985, 1990, 1992).”
Understanding the Nature of Face Processing Impairment in Autism: Insights From Behavioral and Electrophysiological Studies (2005, background): “Face processing has also been posited as critical to the development of social relationships and theory of mind (e.g., Baron-Cohen, 1995; Perrett et al., 1990; Perrett, Hietanen, Oram, & Benson, 1992; Williams, Whiten, Suddendorf, & Perrett, 2001).”
Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model. (1997, background): “3 Moreover, neurophysiological data show that visual displays of particular organs, notably parts of the face and hands in monkeys, activate specific brain sites (Desimone, 1991; Gross et al., 1969, 1972; Gross and Sargent, 1992; Perrett et al., 1987, 1992; Rolls, 1992).”