An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning
By Rishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad Norouzi. 2020
22 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Ofir Nachum
- Chelsea Finn
- Shixiang Shane Gu
- Aravind Rajeswaran
- George Tucker
- Abhishek Gupta
Citations in the corpus
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence Modeling (2021, methodology): “We compare to CQL [14], REM [13], and QR-DQN [22] on four Atari tasks (Breakout, Qbert, Pong, and Seaquest) that are evaluated in Agarwal et al.”
- Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasets (2020, positive): “Offline RL methods aim to address this issue, often by constraining the actor updates to avoid excessive deviation from the data distribution [24, 43, 15, 16, 14, 2, 23, 10, 8, 28, 40, 25, 51].”
- Continuous Doubly Constrained Batch Reinforcement Learning (2021, methodology): “[25, 64] consider model-based approaches for batch RL, and [1] find ensembles partly address some of the issues that arise in batch”
- RL Unplugged: Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning (2020, methodology): “It is a popular benchmark to measure the progress of online RL methods, and Atari has recently also become a standard benchmark for offline RL methods (Agarwal et al., 2020; Fujimoto et al., 2019) as well.”
- QPLEX: Duplex Dueling Multi-Agent Q-Learning (2020, background): “Agarwal et al. (2020) presents an optimistic perspective of offline Q-learning that DQN and its variants can achieve superior performance in Atari 2600 games (Bellemare et al.”
- What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation? (2020, methodology): “…recently, there are an increasing number of both model-free [Laroche et al., 2019, Fujimoto et al., 2019, Jaques et al., 2020, Kumar et al., 2019, Agarwal et al., 2020] and model-based [Ross and Bagnell, 2012, Kidambi et al., 2020] offline RL methods, with steady improvements in performance…”
- Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization (2021, background): “Even though offline RL offers the promise of leveraging existing logged datasets, current offline RL algorithms (Fujimoto et al., 2019; Agarwal et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2019) are typically evaluated using online interaction, which limits their applicability in the real world.”
- PLAS: Latent Action Space for Offline Reinforcement Learning (2020, background): “Recent work proposes different approaches in this direction [9, 10, 11, 12, 13].”
- Provably Good Batch Reinforcement Learning Without Great Exploration (2020, background): “Another recent work [2] highlights that sufficiently large and diverse datasets can lead to good batch RL results but we focus on the other side of the coin: a robust update rule even if we do not have a good dataset.”