The Promises and Pitfalls of Robo-Advising

By Francesco D’acunto, Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala, Alberto G. Rossi. The Review of financial studies, 2019

381 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We study a robo-advising portfolio optimizer that constructs tailored strategies based on in- vestors’ holdings and preferences. Adopters are similar to non-adopters in terms of demographics, but have more assets under management, trade more, and have higher risk-adjusted performance. The robo-advising tool has opposite effects across investors with different levels of diversification before adoption. It increases portfolio diversification and decreases volatility for those that held less than 5 stocks before adoption. These investors’ portfolios perform better after using the tool. At the same time, robo-advising barely affects diversification for investors that held more than 10 stocks before adoption. These investors trade more after adoption with no effect on average performance. For all investors, robo-advising reduces - but does not fully eliminate - pervasive behavioral biases such as the disposition effect, trend chasing, and the rank effect, and increases attention based on online account logins. Our results emphasize the promises and pitfalls of robo-advising tools, which are becoming ubiquitous all over the world.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fcdd6390881a6400d8118870c4bc8f1e7bcd50f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Da Ke

In Finance

  1. Da Ke

Citations in the corpus