Size-dependent inelastic behavior of particle-reinforced metal–matrix composites

By L. Dai, Z. Ling, Yi-long Bai. 2001

327 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fb6b72c5b12da25b613311b183fdbaee601434a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

1. H. Dieringa
2. Boqi Xiao
3. Zongyi Ma
4. A. Kasar
5. Wang Quanzhao
6. Manoj Gupta
7. Rajender S. Varma
8. Ke Yang

In Mechanical Engineering

1. H. Dieringa
2. Boqi Xiao
3. Zongyi Ma
4. Massoud Malaki
5. Pradeep L. Menezes
6. A. Kasar
7. Rajender S. Varma
8. Wenwu Xu

In Mechanics of Materials

1. Pradeep L. Menezes
2. Zongyi Ma
3. H. Dieringa

Citations in the corpus

• Advanced Metal Matrix Nanocomposites (2019, background): “[151] suggests Equation (13) to calculate the contribution of the difference in Young’s modulus to the increase in strength of the α material coefficient and the ε bulk strain of the composite.”
• “Self-sharpening” tungsten high-entropy alloy (2020, background): “Similar to dual-phase steels [56] or particle reinforced metal matrix composites [57], the presence of stronger and stiffer phases, as BCC dendrites and m phase in the present alloy, brings about load transfer from the FCC matrix.”
• An enhanced FEM model for particle size dependent flow strengthening and interface damage in particle reinforced metal matrix composites (2011, methodology): “Except for the dislocation punching models, many researchers introduced particle size effects into the various continuum models by incorporating dislocation plasticity to alter the flow stress in the composite matrix, which achieved good results [11–15].”