Do echolocation signal parameters restrict bats' choice of prey?
By Rd Houston, A. Boonman, Gareth J. F. Jones. 2004
96 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0fad23c44bc404bffe8d9bb6e9558acf3a8a48b6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Kirsten Jung
- D. Russo
- Gareth J. F. Jones
- E. Kalko
- M. Mucedda
- Monica Iris Reyes Bello
- S. Biscardi
- E. Pidinchedda
Citations in the corpus
- Divergent echolocation call frequencies in insular rhinolophids (Chiroptera): a case of character displacement? (2007, background): “Frequency may importantly influence reflectivity in relation to target size only for large frequency differences (Houston et al., 2004), which was clearly not the case with Sardinian and peninsular rhinolophids.”
- Echolocation calls in Central American emballonurid bats: signal design and call frequency alternation (2007, background): “In contrast to bats using distinct broadband fm-components in their call such as vespertilionid and molossid bats flying in edge space, bats with narrowband qcf-signals and very short fm-components such as emballonurid bats will probably not be able to classify the echoes of more distant objects in ”