Analysis of the energy access improvement and its socio-economic impacts in rural areas of developing countries

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What makes people adopt improved cookstoves? Empirical evidence from rural northwest Pakistan (2012, background): “The energy-efficient and inexpensive stoves programs not only reduce pressure on the biomass resource base but also minimize household expenditures on biomass, shorten the time required for fuelwood collection, and reduce concentration of smoke and indoor pollution (Barnes et al., 1994; Kanagawa and”
Household energy economics in rural Ethiopia: a cost-benefit analysis of biogas energy. (2012, unknown): “Following the work of Kanagawa and Nakata (2007) the following formula was used for calculating opportunity costs of energy sources [30].”
Beyond fuelwood savings: Valuing the economic benefits of introducing improved biomass cookstoves in the Purépecha region of Mexico (2010, background): “socioeconomic, environmental or health perspectives (Jones and Williams, 1998; Gupta and Ravindranath, 1997; Kishore and Ramana, 2002; Mehta and Shahpar, 2004; Kanagawa and Nakata, 2007; Habermehl, 2007, 2008).”
Determinants of Household Energy Consumption in India (2010, methodology): “There have been some previous attempts on formal modelling of household energy choices, using a linear cost-minimization solution concept, e.g. by Kanagawa and Nakata (2007, 2008) for the case of India, and by Howells et al. (2005) for an African village.”