Loan Phonology: Perception, Salience, The Lexicon and OT

By H. Jacobs, Carlos Gussenhoven. 2000

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Psycholinguistic Theory of Loanword Adaptations (2004, background): “…in conformity with the native phonology (Yip 1993; Paradis 1995; Broselow 2000; Jacobs & Gussenhoven 2000), and even that they provide insight into it, revealing the relative ranking of faithfulness constraints that would otherwise remain ‘hidden’ (see, for instance, Jacobs & Gussenhoven (2000)).”
The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology (2006, background): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2005.05.007 The grammar proper has little or no access to perceptual information (Jacobs and Gussenhoven, 2000; Paradis, 1995; LaCharité and Paradis, 2005).”
On the perceptual origin of loanword adaptations: experimental evidence from Japanese* (2008, methodology): “In standard accounts of loanword adaptations, the input to loanword adaptations is constituted by the surface form of the source language, and the adaptations are computed by the phonological grammar of the borrowing language (see, among many others, Hyman 1970, Jacobs & Gussenhoven 2000).”