Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection.
By S. Stewart, G. Winters, M. Fishbein, H. Tazelaar, J. Kobashigawa, J. Abrams, C. Andersen, A. Angelini, Gerald J. Berry, M. Burke and 13 more. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2005
1,495 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Transplantation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f9022112980abaeaa7dd0afbaf3bea11718bd79
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
In Surgery
In Transplantation
Citations in the corpus
- The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. (2010, background): “2 The update of ACR grading reflects this continuum of cell infiltration and injury.(9) Mononuclear cells infiltration without or with only one focus of myocyte damage is classified as Grade 1R, whereas an infiltrate plus the presence of multifocal myocyte damage is Grade 2R.”
- Banff ’09 Meeting Report: Antibody Mediated Graft Deterioration and Implementation of Banff Working Groups (2010, background): “However, current criteria for diagnosing cardiac acute ABMR lack standardization of definitions and grading of lesions, require acute graft dysfunction and more importantly, depend on screening by histology (21).”
- Revision of the 1996 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of lung rejection. (2005, background): “The 2004 ISHLT cardiac rejection meeting reviewed evidence from histopathology, immunopathology and clinical task forces and was able to suggest diagnostic criteria in specific clinical circumstances so that further assessment of this entity could be encouraged.(5) Pathologists can follow the guidan”