Difference, Disparity, and Race/Ethnic Bias in Federal Sentencing

By R. Everett, Roger A. Wojtkiewicz. 2002

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f8ce7ee58b3070f5c7485b7d9bd6e261e63948a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. David Eitle
2. Stewart J. D’Alessio
3. D. Mears
4. Xia Wang
5. Lisa Stolzenberg
6. Jeffery T. Ulmer
7. Kareem L. Jordan
8. Tina L. Freiburger

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Xia Wang
2. David Eitle
3. Stewart J. D’Alessio
4. D. Mears
5. Lisa Stolzenberg
6. Jeffery T. Ulmer
7. Joshua C. Cochran
8. Alex R. Piquero

Citations in the corpus

• Race and Cumulative Discrimination in the Prosecution of Criminal Defendants (2013, background): “There is considerable evidence that Hispanic defendants experience the same perception (Everett & Wojtkiewicz, 2002; Schlesinger, 2005; Spohn & Holleran, 2000).”
• A Multilevel Test of Minority Threat Effects on Sentencing (2010, background): “sentencing and typically have shown that men and minorities are sentenced more harshly, even after controlling for offenders’ prior criminal record and offense seriousness (e.g., Bushway and Piehl 2001; Engen and Gainey 2000; Everett and Wojtkiewicz 2002; Mitchell 2005; Mustard 2001; Spohn 2000; S”
• The Independent and Joint Effects of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Age on Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts (2010, unknown): “However, even with sentencing guidelines in place, extralegal disparities appear not to have been eliminated (Everett & Wojtkiewicz, 2002).”