Quantitative or qualitative? Measurement issues in the study of grief.

By R. Neimeyer, N. Hogan. 2001

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f7c0150efcf293d414a840fbe42359d05ed3756

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Neimeyer
2. J. Gillies
3. J. Currier
4. J. Holland
5. Holly Gwen Prigerson
6. B. Davies.
7. M. Jackson
8. S. Dwyer

In Social Psychology

1. J. Holland
2. J. Currier
3. R. Neimeyer

Citations in the corpus

• SEARCHING FOR THE MEANING OF MEANING: GRIEF THERAPY AND THE PROCESS OF RECONSTRUCTION (2000, methodology): “Drawing inspiration from recent qualitative research in bereavement ( Neimeyer & Hogan, 2000 ) and broader constructivist theories of psychotherapy ( Neimeyer & Mahoney, 1995 ), meaning reconstruction might be de ned more broadly to include the following.”
• Meaning Reconstruction in the First Two Years of Bereavement: The Role of Sense-Making and Benefit-Finding (2006, methodology): “Though these modes of distress are often concomitant with grief, they are by no means synonymous (Neimeyer & Hogan, 2001).”
• Loss, Grief, and the Search for Significance: Toward a Model of Meaning Reconstruction in Bereavement (2006, background): ““Methodological pluralism” can be especially informative in bridging gaps between qualitative and quantitative results and in building theory (Neimeyer & Hogan, 2001).”
• Family and social networks after bereavement: experiences of support, change and isolation (2011, background): “…experience of grief, including the description of ‘symptoms’, ‘risk’ factors, and outcomes, without significant attendance to the context of the bereavement itself on the resulting grief experiences (Breen & O’Connor, 2007a; Center for the Advancement of Health, 2004; Neimeyer & Hogan, 2001).”
• Qualitative bereavement research: incongruity between the perspectives of participants and research ethics boards (2010, background): “Email: jlbuckle@swgc.mun.ca ever-developing model of grief that focuses on the complexity of human relationships and the connectedness of individuals to those living and to those who have died (Neimeyer & Hogan, 2001; Silverman & Klass, 1996).”
• Mourning and Meaning (2002, background): “for a carefully constructed assessment of complicated grief is strong (Neimeyer & Hogan, 2001; Prigerson, Maciejewski, et al., 1995).”
• Roles for Psychologists in End-of-Life Care: Emerging Models of Practice. (2003, unknown): “Likewise, psychological assessment has become more refined, resulting in growing criticism of popular but problematic instruments for assessing death anxiety (Neimeyer, 1994) and grief (Neimeyer & Hogan, 2001) and the development of more valid and clinically useful alternatives.”