Visualizing Data
By William S. Cleveland. 1993
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
- William J. Sydeman
- Chris Stolte
- Scott D. Brown
- P. Hanrahan
- Jean-Philippe Fortin
- Daniel A. Keim
- C. Pirk
Citations in the corpus
- Visualizing the effects of predictor variables in black box supervised learning models (2016, background): “Conditioning plots (coplots) (Chambers and Hastie, 1992; Cleveland, 1993), conditional response plots (Cook, 1995) and individual conditional expectation plots (Goldstein et al., 2015) plot quantities like f.xj, x\j/ against xj for a collection of discrete values of x\j (conditional response and…”
- “Some of My Best Friends Are …”: Interracial Friendships, Class, and Segregation in America† (2007, methodology): “The plot employs a locally weighted scatterplot smoother (loess) to directly detect nonlinear patterns in the data (Cleveland 1993).”
- Residency and depth movements of a coastal group of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) (2006, methodology): “A Loess smoothing technique was employed following Cleveland (1993). Each time series was modelled as”
- Climate change, reproductive performance and diet composition of marine birds in the southern California Current system, 1969-1997 (2001, methodology): “We used robust locally weighted regression (LOWESS, Cleveland, 1993) with 90% band widths to illustrate trends in reproductive performance for each species at each location through time.”
- Polaris: a system for query, analysis and visualization of multi-dimensional relational databases (2000, methodology): “Cleveland [7][8] used theoretical and experimental results to determine how well people can use these different retinal properties to compare quantitative variations.”
- Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data (2017, methodology): “The Bland-Altman plot [Bland and Altman, 1986], also know as the Tukey mean-difference plot [Cleveland, 1993] or MA-plot [Dudoit et al., 2002, Bolstad et al., 2003] has been used extensively in the genomic literature to compare treatments and investigate dye bias.”
- Above- and below-ground effects of aspen clonal regeneration and succession to conifers (2001, methodology): “LOESS curves are derived by fitting a series of weighted linear regressions to data, where the weights decrease with dis- tance from the point of interest (Cleveland 1993).”
- Displaying Uncertainty With Shading (2008, methodology): “Contours of constant density are then calculated and filled with a constant shade, using the interpolation algorithm described by Cleveland (1993) as implemented in the filled.contour() function in R (R Development Core Team 2008).”
- A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems (2010, background): “Another very useful, but highly neglected, graphical tool to visualize outliers is the Cleveland dotplot (Cleveland 1993).”
- Scatterplot3d - an R package for visualizing multivariate data (2003, unknown): “Lattice is an implementation of Trellis Graphics , which is a framework for data visualization developed at the Bell Labs by Becker et al. (1996), extending ideas presented in Cleveland (1993).”
- Migration Timing, Growth, and Estimated Parr‐to‐Smolt Survival Rates of Wild Snake River Spring–Summer Chinook Salmon from the Salmon River Basin, Idaho, to the Lower Snake River (2007, background): “—Box plots (Cleveland 1993) of estimated parr-to-smolt survival to Lower Granite Dam (Snake River) for wild spring–summer Chinook salmon tagged in the Salmon River basin, Idaho, by tagging site (upper panel) and migration year (lower panel).”