Construct validation of a self-report psychopathy scale: does Levenson's self-report psychopathy scale measure the same constructs as Hare's psychopathy checklist-revised?

By Chad A. Brinkley, W. Schmitt, Stevens S. Smith, J. Newman. 2001

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f6ed03acfc97a1b49eb7e50057a18e426fac713

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. V. de Vogel
2. C. de Ruiter

In Sociology and Political Science

1. V. de Vogel
2. C. de Ruiter

Citations in the corpus

• The dark triad and normal personality traits (2006, unknown): “The scale is valid and reliable ( Brinkley, Schmitt, Smith, & Newman, 2001; Lynam, Whiteside, & Jones, 1999; McHoskey et al., 1998).”
• The Reliability and Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist–Revised in a Sample of Female Offenders (2002, result): “R, substance abuse, and criminal behavior (Brinkley et al., 2001; Levenson et al., 1995).”