Torsion gravity: A Reappraisal

By H. Arcos, J. G. Pereira. 2004

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The role played by torsion in gravitation is critically reviewed. After a description of the problems and controversies involving the physics of torsion, a comprehensive presentation of the teleparallel equivalent of general relativity is made. According to this theory, curvature and torsion are alternative ways of describing the gravitational field, and consequently related to the same degrees of freedom of gravity. However, more general gravity theories, like for example Einstein–Cartan and gauge theories for the Poincare and the affine groups, consider curvature and torsion as representing independent degrees of freedom. By using an active version of the strong equivalence principle, a possible solution to this conceptual question is reviewed. This solution ultimately favors the teleparallel point of view, and consequently the completeness of general relativity. A discussion of the consequences for gravitation is presented.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f683eeaba54de884305f142026bbcc9b5360a3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Emmanuel N. Saridakis
  2. Lavinia Heisenberg
  3. S. Tsujikawa
  4. Tomi Koivisto
  5. Salvatore Capozziello
  6. H. Hoekstra
  7. Thomas D. Kitching
  8. Catherine Heymans

In Geometry and Topology

  1. Salvatore Capozziello
  2. Emmanuel N. Saridakis
  3. M. De Laurentis
  4. Claudia de Rham
  5. Yi-Fu Cai

Citations in the corpus