Risky lifestyles and dating violence: A theoretical test of violent victimization

By Angela R. Gover. 2004

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f4ab8aac2b6c775c860d96bd90cc6f3a0fc9182

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Assessing the Overlap in Dating Violence Perpetration and Victimization among South Korean College Students: The Influence of Social Learning and Self-Control (2011, background): “Control Variables Prior research has identified risk and protective factors for involvement in dating violence ( Gover, 2004 ).”
Assessing the Effect of Routine Activity Theory and Self-Control on Property, Personal, and Sexual Assault Victimization (2012, background): “…that fundamental gender relations and inequality in power relations between men and women in society are both necessary for understanding rape and intimate partner violence but are ignored by Gottfredson and Hirschi (1990) in their account of the causes of crime (e.g., individual self-control).”
General Strain Theory and the Relationship Between Early Victimization and Drug Use (2008, methodology): “The lifestyles/routine activities perspective has also been used to explain the link between victimization and offending (Jensen and Brownfield 1986 ; Forde and Kennedy 1997 ; Gover 2004 ; Schreck et al.”
“Can’t Stop, Won’t Stop”: Self-Control, Risky Lifestyles, and Repeat Victimization (2012, background): “…activity perspectives, behaviors that are ‘‘risky’’ (i.e., violent, criminal, or deviant) should increase the likelihood of victimization (Burrow and Apel 2008; Gover 2004; Mustaine and Tewksbury 1998; Sampson and Lauritsen 1990; Schreck et al. 2008; Smith and Ecob 2007; Taylor et al. 2008).”
The Intergenerational Transmission of Intimate Partner Violence: Differentiating Correlates in a Random Community Sample (2012, background): “Increased church attendance has significantly reduced violence in dating relationships (Gover 2004; Laner 1985) andmarital unions (Cunradi et al. 2002; Ellison et al. 1999), underscoring the potential contribution of the faith community in protecting intimate partnerships.”
College Women’s Experiences of Dating Violence in Casual and Exclusive Relationships (2012, background): “While members of the academic and practice communities agree that violence among adolescents and young adults is a major social problem, methodological approaches to examine these phenomena have varied (Gover, 2004).”
Dating and intimate partner violence among young persons ages 15–30: Evidence from a systematic review (2017, unknown): “, Gover, A. R., & Powers, R. A. (2013). A critical examination of the causal link between child abuse and adult dating violence perpetration and victimization from a propensity score matching approach.”
The Effects of School Crime Prevention on Students’ Violent Victimization, Risk Perception, and Fear of Crime: A Multilevel Opportunity Perspective (2011, unknown): “…and activities that increase public exposure and target suitability and/or weaken guardianship are considered “risky” (e.g., Cohen, Kluegel, & Land, 1981; Fisher, Cullen, & Turner, 2002; Gover, 2004; Kuo, Cuvelier, & Chang, 2009; Miethe, Stafford, & Long, 1987; Mustaine & Tewksbury, 1998).”
Self-control, Victimization, and their Influence on Risky Lifestyles: A Longitudinal Analysis Using Panel Data (2006, background): “Studies spanning the past 25 years have consistently reported that certain lifestyles and contexts increase the chances of victimization (e.g., Fisher et al. 1998; Gover 2004; Hindelang et al. 1978; Miethe and Meier”