Satisfying Constraints on Extraction andAdjunction
By Gosse Bouma, Robert Malouf, Ivan A. Sag. 2001
331 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f4863640d5874307dd89ebd647fedb125d333d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- L. Haegeman
- Christopher D. Manning
- Ivan A. Sag
- Mohit Bansal
- Percy Liang
- Richard Socher
- Luke S. Zettlemoyer
- Caiming Xiong
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Dissociations between Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations (2005, background): “5”
- The Movement Derivation of Conditional Clauses (2010, background): “Circumstantial adjuncts, in contrast, do undergo long movement (Haegeman 2003b; for earlier discussions of long-moved adjuncts, see Postal and Ross 1970, Cinque 1990:93–95, Hukari and Levine 1995, Bouma, Malouf, and Sag 2001).”
- English filler-gap constructions (2010, background): “…(GPSG; see Gazdar et al. 1985), Categorial Grammar (see Steedman 1996, 2000), LFG (see Kaplan and Zaenen 1989), Tree-Adjoining Grammar (TAG; see Kroch 1987, 1989), the 'Simpler Syntax' hypothesis (see Culicover and Jackendoff 2005, Ch. 9), and HPSG (see Bouma et al. 2001; Levine and Hukari 2006).”
- Sign-Based Construction Grammar: An Informal Synopsis (2012, background): “Building on a long tradition, beginning with Gazdar’s (1981) pioneering work and including Pollard and Sag 1994, Bouma et al. 2001, Levine and Hukari 2006, and Chaves 2012, the presence of a gap is encoded in terms of a nonempty specification for the feature GAP (e.g. [GAP 〈NP〉]). By contrast, an ex”