Race, Class or Neighborhood Context: Which Matters More in Measuring Satisfaction with Police?
By Yuning Wu, Ivan Sun, Ruth A. Triplett. 2009
321 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f46a51658e629752105027db4788980ec3cf125
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Justin Nix
- Scott E. Wolfe
- R. Kaminski
- Liqun Cao
- Yuning Wu
- Jeff Rojek
- Christopher D. Kimbrough
- Lisa M. PytlikZillig
In Sociology and Political Science
- Justin Nix
- Scott E. Wolfe
- R. Kaminski
- Liqun Cao
- Yuning Wu
- Jeff Rojek
- Christopher D. Kimbrough
- Lisa M. PytlikZillig
Citations in the corpus
- Race/ethnicity and perceptions of the police: a comparison of White, Black, Asian and Hispanic Americans (2014, background): “…towards police, Whites are more likely to hold favourable opinions because they perceive this social institution as a critical and scarce resource to which they are entitled and more importantly, with which their interests and superiority are ensured (Weitzer and Tuch 2006, Wu et al. 2009).”
- Trust in the Police (2015, background): “Sun, Hu, Wong, He, and Li (2013) recently used a unique sample of Chinese respondents to show that disadvantaged context diminishes trust in neighbors, which hinders trust in the police (see also Reisig & Parks, 2000, 2003; Wu et al., 2009).”
- Race, Social Bonds, and Juvenile Attitudes toward the Police (2015, background): “, 1996; Lai, Cao, & Zhao, 2010), whereas others found class a nonsignificant predictor (Frank et al., 1996; Wu et al., 2009).”
- Media and public perceptions of the police: examining the impact of race and personal experience (2011, unknown): “…4 $15 24,999, 5 $25 34,999, 6 $35 49,999, 7 $50 74,999, 8 $75 99,999, 9 $100,000 1 9 5.91 2.02 Democrat Democrat 1, other 0 0 1 0.41 0.49 Republican Republican 1, other 0 0 1 0.26 0.44 (Decker 1981, Sullivan et al. 1987, Murty et al. 1990, Cheurprakobkit 2000, Frank et al. 2005, Wu et al. 2009).”