Minimizing development and maintenance costs in supporting persistently optimized BLAS
By R. Clint Whaley, Antoine Petitet. 2005
293 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Brian Curless
- Jian Cheng
- Steve Horvath
- Evan R. Sparks
- Sameer Agarwal
- Ameet Talwalkar
- S. M. Seitz
- Jiaxiang Wu
In Hardware and Architecture
- Brian Curless
- Steve Horvath
- Sameer Agarwal
- Ameet Talwalkar
- S. M. Seitz
- Peter Langfelder
- Changchang Wu
- Andrey A. Shabalin
Citations in the corpus
- Quantized Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Devices (2015, methodology): “We compare the theoretical and realistic speed-up in Section 5.4, and discuss the effect of adopting the BLAS library for acceleration.”
- Paleo: A Performance Model for Deep Neural Networks (2016, background): “For instance, achieving peak FLOPS is a difficult proposition, usually requiring customized libraries developed by organizations with intimate knowledge of the underlying hardware, e.g., Intel’s MKL (int, 2009), ATLAS (Whaley & Petitet, 2005), and cuDNN.”
- Matrix eQTL: ultra fast eQTL analysis via large matrix operations (2011, methodology): “There are faster versions of BLAS available for R called ATLAS (32 bit only) by (Whaley and Petitet, 2005) and GOTO (64 bit only) by (Goto and Geijn, 2008) adapted for R by Ei-Ji Nakama [http://prs.ism.ac.jp/∼nakama/SurviveGotoBLAS2/binary/windows/x64/].”
- Multicore bundle adjustment (2011, background): “An interesting direction for future work is a framework along the lines of FFTW [7] or ATLAS [14] for automatically tuning the parameters of the system either at compile time or at runtime.”
- Fast R Functions for Robust Correlations and Hierarchical Clustering (2012, methodology): “On an 8-core system using a faster BLAS matrix multiplication (Whaley and Petitet 2005), the speedup compared to the standard R correlation calculation ranges from about 5 when the fraction of missing data is relatively large (here 0.”