Still blaming the victim of intimate partner violence? Women’s narratives of victim desistance and redemption when seeking support
By Silke Meyer. 2016
140 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This article presents a theoretical examination of victims’ (N = 28) experiences when trying to rebuild a victimization-free identity after having experienced multiple years of severe intimate partner violence (IPV). Narratives reveal experiences of victim-blaming attitudes when seeking help from informal and general formal support sources, which suggest that victims of IPV do not meet the criteria of the ‘ideal’, innocent victim worthy of ongoing formal and informal support. Drawing on criminological theories of redemption and desistance, in combination with victimological theories around social stigma and construction of the ‘ideal victim’, the study finds that victims often feel they have to redeem themselves as worthy of empathy in order to access ongoing support. These misplaced expectations of ‘desistance’ with the victim rather than the perpetrator highlight that the social stigma associated with IPV goes beyond the private nature of this type of violence and extends to victim behavior and decision making.
Subfields: Health, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f438d5f2e6590b21d480196e6addcc4db1c857b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- “No one would ever believe me”: An exploration of the impact of intimate partner violence victimization on men. (2019, background): “…and that there are specific victim blaming issues relates to IPV, for example victims are blamed more if they stay with, or return to the abuser (Yamawaki, Ochoa-Shipp, Pulsipher, Harlos & Swindler, 2012), or if they do not meet the criteria of what is constructed as an ideal victim (Meyer, 2016).”