Agricultural extension policy in Australia: the good, the bad and the misguided
By S. Marsh, D. Pannell. 2000
177 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f3a506a03004bc61c23545a54a3807e80027637
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
- Jock R. Anderson
- G. Feder
- Regina Birner
- D. Pannell
- Y. Desjeux
- C. Glendenning
- S. Babu
- K. Asenso-okyere
Citations in the corpus
- Rural extension services (2003, unknown): “The economic rationale for farmers to pay for extension services is generally clear and the trend toward such user payment is well established in OECD countries (e.g., Hone, 1991; Marsh and Pannell, 2000).”
- Linking Smallholder Farmers to Markets and the Implications for Extension and Advisory Services (2014, background): “This process also put more control of extension decisions into the hands of farmers rather than relying on a top-down science push (Marsh and Pannell, 2000).”
- The private sector's role in agricultural extension systems: potential and limitations (2011, background): “A similar concentration of private extension services delivered by commercial input suppliers on their best customers has been noted by Marsh and Pannell (2000)”
- New Challenges in Agricultural Advisory Services from a Research Perspective: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda (2012, background): “Nisha and Rakhesh, 2006, in India; Orozco et al., 2008, in Mexico). In Asia, Van den Berg and Jiggins (2007) show, however, that farmer schools have impacts that go beyond the simple acquisition of technical knowledge.”
- Dryland salinity: economic, scientific, social and policy dimensions (2001, background): “In the case of information, this argument is commonly proposed as a potential justi¢cation for government investment in R&D and information provision services such as agricultural extension (e.g. Alston et al. 1995; Marsh and Pannell 2000).”
- Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities (2004, background): “The economic rationale for farmers to pay for extension services is generally clear, and the practice is well established in high-income countries (Marsh and Pannell 2000).”