Estimating reliability and resolution of probability forecasts through decomposition of the empirical score
By Jochen Bröcker. 2012
40 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Thomas E. Fricker
- Dave Zachariah
- Fredrik Lindsten
- David Widmann
- Michael C. Mozer
- Jonathon Shlens
- Nicholas Cain
- Rebecca Roelofs
In Global and Planetary Change
- Thomas E. Fricker
- Dave Zachariah
- Fredrik Lindsten
- David Widmann
- Michael C. Mozer
- Jonathon Shlens
- Nicholas Cain
- Rebecca Roelofs
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Thomas E. Fricker
- Michael C. Mozer
- Percy Liang
- Dave Zachariah
- Fredrik Lindsten
- Jonathon Shlens
- Tengyu Ma
- David Widmann
Citations in the corpus
- Verified Uncertainty Calibration (2019, methodology): “An alternative estimator introduced in the meteorological literature [18, 19] reduces the bias of the plugin estimator; we prove that it achieves sample complexity that scales with p B by leveraging error cancellations across bins.”
- Mitigating bias in calibration error estimation (2020, methodology): “We consider two estimators previously proposed in the literature: the debiased estimator (Brocker, 2012; Ferro and Fricker, 2012), which we refer to as ECEdebias, and the smoothed kernel density estimator of Zhang et al.”
- Calibration tests in multi-class classification: A unifying framework (2019, methodology): “Sample complexity bounds for a bias-reduced estimator of the ECE introduced in metereological literature (Bröcker, 2011; Ferro and Fricker, 2012) were derived in concurrent work (Kumar et al., 2019).”
- A bias‐corrected decomposition of the Brier score (2012, methodology): “Bröcker (2011) showed that the three terms in the Brier score decomposition (1) are biased.”