Gender differences in owners interacting with pet dogs: an observational study

By E. Prato-Previde, G. Fallani, P. Valsecchi. 2006

175 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Genetics, Pharmacy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f3293ddae262122cf9fc792511cb41f5376cfa1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. A. Dóka
2. L. Kurdek
3. J. Topál
4. Á. Miklósi
5. P. Pongrácz
6. Enikö Kubinyi

In Genetics

1. Á. Miklósi
2. Enikö Kubinyi
3. J. Topál
4. P. Pongrácz
5. Márta Gácsi
6. A. Dóka
7. L. Kurdek
8. C. Wynne

In Pharmacy

1. Á. Miklósi
2. Enikö Kubinyi
3. J. Topál
4. Márta Gácsi
5. P. Pongrácz
6. A. Dóka

Citations in the corpus

• The dog as a model for understanding human social behavior (2009, background): “This anthropomorphic attitude gains some support from observational studies revealing analogies in child–human and dog–human interaction (Prato‐Previde et al., 2006) including verbal communication, such as the use of ‘‘motherese’’ and ‘‘doggerel,’’ respectively (see Hirsch‐Pasek and Treiman, 1981; M”
• Pet dogs as attachment figures (2008, background): “The finding regarding proximity maintenance aligns with other evidence that pet owners greatly enjoy the physical presence of their dogs (Allen et al., 2002; Prato-Previde et al., 2006).”