Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to Indian manufacturing firms

By Vinish Kathuria. 2000

323 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f0d16c7a8c448272cea56b04448f33a6d4a8318

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of Industrial Innovation in China: Evidence From its Recent Economic Census (2010, result): “A few recent studies have observed similar negative impacts of foreign investment on domestic enterprises and examples include the study of Djankov and Hoekman (2000) on Czech Rep., and of Kathuria (2000) on India.”
Heterogeneous MNC subsidiaries and technological spillovers: Explaining positive and negative effects in India (2010, background): “By including these control variables therefore, we expect to reduce the possibility of bias due to non-included variables that change across domestic firms and over time (Kathuria, 2000; 2001; 2002).”
Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta‐Analysis (2001, background): “Haddad and Harrison (1993), Chuang and Lin (1999) and Djankov and Hoekman (2000) measure foreign presence as the share of assets held by foreign firms, Aitken and Harrison (1999) use the share of foreign equity participation, while Kathuria (2000) uses the share of sales of foreign firms.”
When and where does foreign direct investment generate positive spillovers? A meta-analysis (2009, background): “In contrast, recent panel data studies show negative effects in two major studies by Aitken and Harrison (1999) on Venezuela and Kathuria (2000) on India.”
Foreign Direct Investment Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation in Chinese Regions: The Role of Regional Industrial Specialization and Diversity (2016, methodology): “KATHURIA (2000) uses Indian data and shows negative spillovers from FDI.”
When does FDI matter? The roles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI (2013, background): “For example, on productivity spillovers, while studies by Aitken and Harrison (1999) in Venezuela and Kathuria (2000) in India found a negative impact of FDI, Liu (2002) in China and Sinani and Meyer (2004) in Estonia found a positive association.”
Growth and the Quality of Foreign Direct Investment: Is All FDI Equal? (2007, background): “Similarly, Kathuria (2000), investigating spillovers from foreign firms in 26 Indian manufacturing industries, finds strong evidence of positive spillovers in “scientific” industries (drugs, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, electronics) relative to “non-scientific” ones (automobiles, non-electrical…”
The Impact of Multinational Enterprise Strategy on Indigenous Enterprises: Horizontal Spillovers and Crowding Out in Developing Countries (2008, unknown): “Studies of Morocco, Uruguay, India, and Co lombia showed mixed or insignificant results (Haddad & Harrison, 1993; Kathuria, 2000; Kokko, Tansini, & Zejan, 1996; Kokko, Zejan, & Tansini, 2001; Kugler, 2001).”
Foreign Direct Investment in South Asia: Policy, Trends, Impact and Determinants (2006, background): “In the Indian case, Kathuria (1998, 2000) suggests that the indirect gains from FDI depend upon the local firm’s ability to learn new technologies by investing in research and development.”
Determinant Factors of FDI Spillovers – What Do We Really Know? (2007, background): “In a sequence of studies for the Indian case, Kanturia (2000, 2001, 2002) separates “scientific” from “non-scientific” sectors and notes that, besides there being a distinct impact in the case of the group of sectors taken into account, as far as the “scientific sectors” are concerned, there is a…”