Non-timber forest products in the global context.
By S. Shackleton, C. Shackleton, P. Shanley. 2011
177 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f04000fd95ba2279cd7ae3b568dbb2cd35ec426
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- A. Angelsen
- C. Shackleton
- Sven Wunder
- B. Belcher
- J. Börner
- Mallika Sardeshpande
- R. Babigumira
- S. Bauch
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis (2014, background): “Conceptual discussions of the role and potential contributions of forests to livelihoods include Angelsen and Wunder (2003), Belcher and Schreckenberg (2007), de Sherbinin et al. (2008), Shackleton, Shackleton, and Shanley (2011); and Sunderlin et al. (2005).”
- The management of tree genetic resources and the livelihoods of rural communities in the tropics: non-timber forest products, smallholder agroforestry practices and tree commodity crops (2014, background): “…trade and bartering that occurs in unmonitored local markets, direct household provisioning without products entering markets at all, and the fact that wild-harvested resources are excluded from many large-scale rural household surveys (Angelsen et al., 2011; Shackleton et al., 2007, 2011).”
- Wild Edible Fruits: A Systematic Review of an Under-Researched Multifunctional NTFP (Non-Timber Forest Product) (2019, background): “Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) can be defined as biological products, other than high-value timber, harvested by humans from wild biodiversity in natural or human-modified environments [1].”
- Non-wood forest products in Europe – A quantitative overview (2020, background): “A lack of systematic data on NWFPs leads to a lack of awareness of their importance, which leaves them not being fully considered in rural development, forest and land-use related plans and policies (FAO, 2014; Sills et al., 2011).”