Economic valuation with stated preference techniques : a manual : department for transport

By Ian J. Bateman. 2002

1,026 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f01ff62ee83e1b3f58fa33f94b12fac604e3927

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Information and Willingness to Pay in a Contingent Valuation Study: The Value of S. Erasmo in the Lagoon of Venice (2004, background): “Many researchers (see, for example, Carson et al., 2001; Bateman et al., 2002) consider it a good CV practice to remind respondents succinctly of possible reasons for voting in favor or against the hypothetical public program before asking the referendum question, even though the NOAA Panel did not…”
Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Renewable Energy: A Meta-Regression Analysis (2015, methodology): “Stated preference techniques that are predominately applied to identify preferences for RE are: choice experiments - which elicits the value of the characteristics of a good - and contingent valuation - which values the good as a whole (Bateman et al. (2002).”
Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change (2009, background): “While many non-market valuation manuals focus strongly upon the accuracy of information provided to survey respondents (e.g. Bateman et al., 2002), an increasing concern is the comprehension (Boyle, 2003; Mathews et al., 2006) or ‘evaluability’ of that information (Hsee 1996a, 1996b; 1998).”
Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe (2011, methodology): “8 See the online version of this paper for a colour reproduction of this Figure or download Hime et al. (2009) at http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cserge/pub/wp/edm/edm_2009_01.pdf ladder while the quality of improved stretches was specified as attaining the blue level.”
THE VALUE OF OPEN SPACE: EVIDENCE FROM STUDIES OF NONMARKET BENEFITS (2005, background): “People who are asked about preserving a particular farm or farm area may give a response that reflects their 22 See Mitchell and Carson (1993) for an early discussion of CV methods, and Bateman et al. (2002) for an overview of more recent developments.”
The dispersion and development of consumer preferences for genetically modified food — A meta-analysis (2009, methodology): “Stated-preference methods involve the elicitation of responses to open-ended questions or predefined alternatives in the form of ratings, rankings or choices (Bateman et al., 2002).”
Public attitudes towards and demand for hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles: A review of the evidence and methodological implications (2010, background): “For comprehensive reviews of potential sources of bias see Mitchell and Carson (1989), Carson et al. (2001), Bateman et al. (2002) or Champ et al. (2003).”