Starbursts – from 30 Doradus to Lyman-break galaxies

By Richard de Grijs, R. O’Connell. 2004

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f00f837452ebc53acef8ed22898ff9503fd7bd5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Instrumentation

Citations in the corpus

Merging binary black holes formed through chemically homogeneous evolution in short-period stellar binaries (2015, methodology): “(6) For the metallicity distribution as a function of redshift, we use the fit of Langer & Norman (2006) based in turn on the mass–metallicity relation of Savaglio et al. (2005) and the average cosmic metallicity scaling of Kewley & Kobulnicky (2005, 2007).”
THE ANTENNAE GALAXIES (NGC 4038/4039) REVISITED: ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEYS AND NICMOS OBSERVATIONS OF A PROTOTYPICAL MERGER (2010, background): “However, recently there have been claims (e.g., Fritze-von Alvensleben 2004; de Grijs & Parmentier 2007; Anders et al. 2007) that the initial cluster luminosity function has a turnover at faint magnitudes, and is closer to the Gaussian form found for old globular clusters.”
Properties of Bars and Bulges in the Hubble Sequence (2007, background): “The predominance of old stellar populations and the c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000 de Vaucouleurs type surface brightness profile are generally used to claim that bulges in S0-S0/a galaxies are mergerbuilt structures (Schweizer 2005).”
On the Collapsar Model of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts:Constraints from Cosmic Metallicity Evolution (2005, methodology): “Since we are dealing here with massive star formation from the interstellar medium and since the metallicity constraint is from the physics of line-driven winds we use the scaling with redshift derived from emission-line studies by Kewley and Kobulnicky (2005, 2006) for [O/H].”
HERSCHEL-ATLAS GALAXY COUNTS AND HIGH-REDSHIFT LUMINOSITY FUNCTIONS: THE FORMATION OF MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES (2011, result): “A comparison of our LFs with the UV ones at z ≈ 2−3 (Sawicki & Thompson 2005; Reddy & Steidel 2009) for galaxies with comparable SFRs shows that the UV space densities are a factor & 100 lower, implying that the UV bright, dust-free phase is much shorter than the farIR bright phase.”
The stellar and sub-stellar IMF of simple and composite populations (2011, background): “The suggestions for top-heavy IMFs in star bursts (e.g. Elmegreen 2005; Eisenhauer 2001) were typically taken to be very uncertain due to the evidence stemming from distant unresolved and hard-to-observe star-forming systems.”
A Close Look at Star Formation around Active Galactic Nuclei (2007, unknown): “Subject headinggs: galaxies: active — galaxies: nuclei — galaxies: Seyfert — galaxies: starburst — infrared: galaxies”
Star Formation in AEGIS Field Galaxies since z = 1.1: Staged Galaxy Formation and a Model of Mass-dependent Gas Exhaustion (2007, background): “CDM structure formation provides a framework for a systematic relation between the dominant SF epoch and present-day galaxy mass (Neistein et al. 2006).”
An Hα Imaging Survey of Galaxies in the Local 11 Mpc Volume (2004, methodology): “We are also using these data in conjunction with other surveys to study the Schmidt star formation law (Kennicutt1998b) and other SFR scaling relations, and to calibrate metrics of star formation activity for eventual application to lookback studies (Kennicutt et al. 2005a, 2005b).”
The chemically homogeneous evolutionary channel for binary black hole mergers: rates and properties of gravitational-wave events detectable by advanced LIGO (2016, methodology): “For the metallicity distribution as a function of redshift, we follow Langer & Norman (2006), which is based on the mass–metallicity relation of Savaglio et al. (2005) and the average cosmic metallicity scaling of Kewley & Kobulnicky (2005, 2007).”
The Variation of Integrated Star Initial Mass Functions among Galaxies (2005, background): “Thus, the case can be made that the IMF differs from cluster to cluster (Scalo 1998, 2005; Elmegreen 2004).”