Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood : Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives

By Jennifer S. Barber. 2001

267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eff972fa53ff6cd22947cd95ca48c174b8e026b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

1. Jane E. Klobas
2. T. Lappegård
3. R. Lesthaeghe
4. I. Ajzen

In Gender Studies

1. Jane E. Klobas
2. T. Lappegård
3. R. Lesthaeghe
4. I. Ajzen
5. M. Kreyenfeld
6. E. Geisler
7. Ann‐Zofie Duvander

In Sociology and Political Science

1. T. Lappegård
2. R. Lesthaeghe
3. Jane E. Klobas
4. M. Kreyenfeld
5. E. Geisler
6. Ann‐Zofie Duvander

Citations in the corpus

• The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. (2010, background): “American social scientists took the lead in organizing panel surveys, and it is mainly on the basis of these that the recursive model of selection/adaptation could be checked (e.g., Waite, Goldscheider, and Witsberger 1986; Axinn and Thornton 1993; Barber 2001; Clarkberg 2002).”
• Now or later? The theory of planned behavior and timing of fertility intentions (2011, background): “…toward abortion are associated with intention to have an abortion or not (Miller & Pasta, 1994); attitudes toward gender equality are associated with the decision to have a child (Moors, 2008); and general positive and negative attitudes are associated with childbearing intentions (Barber, 2001).”