An overview of foodborne pathogen detection: in the perspective of biosensors.

By Vijayalakshmi Velusamy, K. Arshak, O. Korostynska, Kamila Oliwa, C. Adley. Biotechnology Advances, 2010

1,147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eff4a98a3eb67724cdeda418a7fb80183b8910b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. A. Cifuentes
2. Ellen Cesewski
3. Blake N. Johnson

In Ecology

1. A. Cifuentes

In Molecular Biology

1. A. Cifuentes
2. J. Premanandh

Citations in the corpus

• Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations (2015, methodology): “Detection of toxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 by using a SAW biosensor was reported by Berkenpas et al. (2006).”
• Advances in rapid detection methods for foodborne pathogens. (2014, methodology): “…illnesses, Norovirus, Salmonella , Campylobacter , Staphylococcus aureus , Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium perfringens, Toxoplasma gondii, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 have been generally found to be responsible for the vast majority of illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths [9, 100].”
• Food analysis: Present, future, and foodomics (2012, background): “They have also found use in tracking microbial contamination [70], to follow food safety [71], processing, and to certify food quality and control including the development of the so-called electronic nose [72] or electronic tongue [73] that have a large impact on flavor analysis.”