Present status and future of nematode systematics

By A. Coomans. 2002

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spatiotemporal analysis of population genetic structure in Geomonhystera disjuncta (Nematoda, Monhysteridae) reveals high levels of molecular diversity (2007, background): “This complicates species identification because important morphological features may be situated at scales that are beyond the resolution of light microscopy (Coomans 2002; De Ley et al. 2005; Markmann and Tautz 2005).”
Soil fauna and soil functions: a jigsaw puzzle (2014, background): “…the diversity of soil organisms when morphological taxonomy is unachievable and when trying to solve some nomenclature problems derived from the existence of an elevated number of synonyms and species complexes (e.g., Coomans, 2002; Briones et al., 2009; Emerson et al., 2011; Porco et al., 2013).”
Exploiting generic platform technologies for the detection and identification of plant pathogens (2008, background): “In addition, there is a well-documented decline (e.g. Coomans 2002; Hopkins and Freckleton 2002) in the availability of experts in the field of morphological taxonomy, due at least in part to changing trends in teaching at Universities.”
Mitochondrial DNA variation and cryptic speciation within the free-living marine nematode Pellioditis marina (2005, background): “Their omnipresence and high diversity combined with functional variability render them an interesting model group to test concepts about the link between structural and functional biodiversity (Coomans 2002, De Mesel et al. 2003).”