Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Data using Graph Mincuts
By Avrim Blum, S. Chawla. 2001
1,115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Yoshua Bengio
- Charu C. Aggarwal
- Quoc V. Le
- Percy Liang
- Dacheng Tao
- Sergey Levine
- Mohit Bansal
- Jianfeng Gao
Citations in the corpus
- Deeper Insights into Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-Supervised Learning (2018, background): “Researches along this line include min-cuts (Blum and Chawla 2001) and randomized min-cuts (Blum et al. 2004), spectral graph transducer (Joachims 2003), label propagation (Zhu, Ghahra-mani, and Lafferty 2003) and its variants (Zhou et al. 2004; Bengio, Delalleau, and Le Roux 2006), modified…”
- Attention-based Graph Neural Network for Semi-supervised Learning (2018, background): “There is a long line of literature on this topic since [7] which seeks graph cuts that preserve the known labels and [50] which uses graph Laplacian to regularize the nearby nodes to have similar labels.”
- Semi-Supervised Self-Training of Object Detection Models (2005, background): “A number of authors have taken the approach of representing the relationships between labeled and unlabeled data using a graph in which the edge weights are inversely related to the similarity between the different examples in feature space [3].”
- Regularization and Semi-supervised Learning on Large Graphs (2004, methodology): “This last example is an instantiation of transductive learning where other approaches include the Naive Bayes for text classification in [12], transductive SVM [15,9], the graph mincut approach in [2], and the random walk on the adjacency graph in [14].”
- Using X-ray images and deep learning for automated detection of coronavirus disease (2020, methodology): “The performance of the proposed classification model was evaluated based on accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1 score (Bhandary et al., 2020; Blum & Chawla, 2001).”
- Semi-Supervised Learning on Riemannian Manifolds (2004, methodology): “Although the area of partially labeled classification is fairly new, a considerable amount of work has been done in that field since the early 90's (e.g., (Blum and Chawla, 2001; Castelli and Cover, 1995; Nigam, et al, 2000; Szummer and Jaakkola, 2002)).”
- Semi-Supervised Learning (2019, neutral): “Graph-Based Models This semi-supervised learning method assumes that there is a graph G = {V,E} such that the vertices V are the labeled and unlabeled training instances, and the undirected edges E connect instances i, j with weight wij [4, 14, 3].”
- Label Efficient Semi-Supervised Learning via Graph Filtering (2019, background): “Another line of works rely on graph partition, where the cuts should agree with the labeled vertices and be placed in low density regions [7, 8, 28, 63], among which the most popular one is perhaps the label propagation methods [5, 15, 61].”
- Group-Wise Learning for Aurora Image Classification With Multiple Representations (2019, positive): “In a semisupervised manner, graph mincuts [50] minimizes the number of similar pairs of vertices that are given different labels.”
- Semi-Supervised Polarity Lexicon Induction (2009, background): “Mincuts for semi-supervised learning proposed by Blum and Chawla (2001) tries to classify data-points by partitioning the similarity graph such that it minimizes the number of similar points being labeled differently.”
- Semi-supervised time series classification (2006, methodology): “After the graph is constructed, several approaches can be used, such as graph mincut [5], Tikhonov Regularization [2], Manifold Regularization [3], etc.”
- Node Classification in Social Networks (2011, background): “Blum and Chawla [7] assume that the weights on edges of the graph denote similarity between the associated nodes.”
- Learning from Imbalanced Data (2009, background): “Other representative works for semisupervised learning include the selftraining methods [138], [139], semisupervised support vector machines [140], [141], graph-based methods [142], [143], and Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm with generative mixture models [144], [145].”
- Self-labeled techniques for semi-supervised learning: taxonomy, software and empirical study (2015, background): “Alternatively, SSC can also be viewed as a graph min-cut problem [10].”
- Q-Cut - Dynamic Discovery of Sub-goals in Reinforcement Learning (2002, background): “further details on the Max-Flow algorithms and associated applications), and recently also for enabling efficient use of unlabeled data in classification tasks (see [3]).”