Markovian master equations for quantum thermal machines: local versus global approach

By P. Hofer, M. Perarnau-Llobet, L David M Miranda, G. Haack, Ralph Silva, Jonatan Bohr Brask, Nicolas Brunner. 2017

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The study of quantum thermal machines, and more generally of open quantum systems, often relies on master equations. Two approaches are mainly followed. On the one hand, there is the widely used, but often criticized, local approach, where machine sub-systems locally couple to thermal baths. On the other hand, in the more established global approach, thermal baths couple to global degrees of freedom of the machine. There has been debate as to which of these two conceptually different approaches should be used in situations out of thermal equilibrium. Here we compare the local and global approaches against an exact solution for a particular class of thermal machines. We consider thermodynamically relevant observables, such as heat currents, as well as the quantum state of the machine. Our results show that the use of a local master equation is generally well justified. In particular, for weak inter-system coupling, the local approach agrees with the exact solution, whereas the global approach fails for non-equilibrium situations. For intermediate coupling, the local and the global approach both agree with the exact solution and for strong coupling, the global approach is preferable. These results are backed by detailed derivations of the regimes of validity for the respective approaches.

Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ed3d4abdd81b77e7873e95081dde2094a2201d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Robert Alicki
  2. Bayan Karimi
  3. Jukka P. Pekola
  4. Ronnie Kosloff
  5. Yair Rezek
  6. Gernot Schaller
  7. Andreas J. Winter
  8. Tobias Brandes

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Jukka P. Pekola

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Robert Alicki
  2. Bayan Karimi
  3. Ronnie Kosloff
  4. Jukka P. Pekola
  5. Yair Rezek
  6. Gernot Schaller
  7. Tobias Brandes
  8. Philipp Strasberg

Citations in the corpus