THE ADVANTAGES OF CLONAL INTEGRATION UNDER DIFFERENT ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS: A COMMUNITY-WIDE TEST

By S. Pennings, R. Callaway. 2000

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ec6f133bf0a04537188ba7eae4eabb6d7b93406

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Effects of clonal integration and light availability on the growth and physiology of two invasive herbs (2010, background): “The advantageous effect of clonal integration on the growth of ramets varies among species (Amsberry et al. 2000; Pennings & Callaway 2000).”
Clonality in seagrasses, emergent properties and seagrass landscapes (2005, background): “The response of ramet size to local resources, together with the integration of resources across the clone have been shown to result in emergent properties in clonal plants in general, and in particular the capacity of the clone to average out the local conditions (Pennings & Callaway 2000).”
Do rhizome severing and shoot defoliation affect clonal growth of Leymus chinensis at ramet population level (2004, background): “Up to now, most studies of clonal plant ecology have been focused on their responses to resource heterogeneity (Pennings and Callaway, 2000; van Kleunen and Fisher, 2001), especially of light (Huber and Hutchings, 1997; Stuefer and Huber, 1998), nutrients (Slade and Hutchings, 1987a,1987b; Alpert, 1”
Greater capacity for division of labour in clones of Fragaria chiloensis from patchier habitats (2007, background): “…between plant clones from different habitats have provided evidence that other clonal traits, such as allocation to asexual vs. sexual reproduction (van Noordwijk & de Jong 1986; Linhart & Grant 1996; Prati & Schmid 2000) and resource sharing (Alpert 1999; Pennings & Callaway 2000; Alpert et al .”
Unexpectedly High Clonal Diversity of Two Salt Marsh Perennials Across a Severe Environmental Gradient (2004, unknown): “We conclude that while integration may be important for some clones on a scale of < 1 m (Shumway 1995; Pennings & Callaway 2000), on a larger scale clone size is limited.”
Habitat range and phenotypic variation in salt marsh plants (2005, background): “Because height correlates with biomass for plants in general, and many of these species in particular Bertness and Ellison 1987, Pennings and Callaway 2000 , these results suggest plant fitness may also vary across salt marsh environmental gradients.”
FACILITATION AND COMPETITION ON GRADIENTS IN ALPINE PLANT COMMUNITIES (2001, methodology): “We made efforts to choose small plants without obvious clonal connections at or near the surface, but the clonality of target species may have altered our results as sheltered ramets of clones may have supported exposed ramets (see Alpert and Mooney 1986, Pennings and Callaway 2000).”
Prolonged clonal growth: escape route or route to extinction? (2005, background): “Schaal and Leverich (1996) found no or few sexual reproduction in mown populations of the milkweed Asclepias meadii in hay meadows while seed set and recruitment was occurring in neighboring populations that were managed by burning.”
Differences in performance between genotypes of Fragaria chiloensis with different degrees of resource sharing (2003, background): “Alpert 1999; Oborny et al . 2000; Pennings & Callaway 2000 ).”