Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

By R. Rattazzi, V. Rychkov, E. Tonni, A. Vichi. 2008

1,057 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In an arbitrary unitary 4D CFT we consider a scalar operator phi, and the operator phi(2) defined as the lowest dimension scalar which appears in the OPE phi x phi with a nonzero coefficient. Using general considerations of OPE, conformal block decomposition, and crossing symmetry, we derive a theory-independent inequality [phi(2)] 1 we have f(d) = 2 + O(root d - 1), which shows that the free theory limit is approached continuously. We perform some checks of our bound. We find that the bound is satisfied by all weakly coupled 4D conformal fixed points that we are able to construct. The Wilson-Fischer fixed points violate the bound by a constant O( 1) factor, which must be due to the subtleties of extrapolating to 4 - epsilon dimensions. We use our method to derive an analogous bound in 2D, and check that the Minimal Models satisfy the bound, with the Ising model nearly-saturating it. Derivation of an analogous bound in 3D is currently not feasible because the explicit conformal blocks are not known in odd dimensions. We also discuss the main phenomenological motivation for studying this set of questions: constructing models of dynamical ElectroWeak Symmetry Breaking without flavor problems.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ebe2dc0e05fb3e14ae814196a1d0ed8d9af7f29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

Improved bounds for CFT’s with global symmetries (2011, methodology): “As extensively discussed in [7, 8, 10, 12] crossing symmetry constraint are not compatible with arbitrary spectra of operators nor with arbitrary large OPE coefficients.”
A proof of the conformal collider bounds (2016, result): “Our result also shows the power of the bootstrap methods, first championed by [57–59] and revived more recently in [60].”
TASI Lectures on the Conformal Bootstrap (2016, methodology): “This is the approach taken in the original paper on CFT bounds [54].”
Weight shifting operators and conformal blocks (2017, neutral): “Compact expressions for conformal blocks with external scalars [67, 68] were crucial for the development of modern numerical bootstrap techniques [1].”
Bootstrapping 3D fermions (2015, methodology): “The origin of this development is the observation made in [4] that the combined constraints of crossing symmetry and unitarity on a 4-point function of scalars can be explored numerically.”
Minimal conformal technicolor and precision electroweak tests (2010, background): “The limits on ∆min are quite restrictive [50, 51], but it is important to keep in mind that these bounds do not apply to the quantity of interest for these models.”
Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions (2013, methodology): “In large part, this progress has been inspired by the development of numerical techniques for extracting constraints on the defining data of a CFT using unitarity and crossing symmetry [3, 4].”
Unitarity and the holographic S-Matrix (2011, methodology): “This means that one can obtain robust results about quantum gravity by modeling the correlators of low-dimension operators using bulk effective field theory, and then using the bootstrap approach [17, 19, 35, 36, 25, 20, 37, 38, 39, 26] to constrain correlators that involve operators of larger dimen”
Projectors, shadows, and conformal blocks (2012, background): “Compact expressions for scalar conformal blocks in two and four dimensions [21, 22] were important in the initial discovery of universal bounds on operator dimensions and OPE coefficients [11–13].”
Boundary and interface CFTs from the conformal bootstrap (2015, methodology): “The crossing equations obtained this way provide constraints on the possible CFT data [8], and after the seminal paper [9], a wealth of new results on the space of conformal field theories in dimensions greater than two were found by exploiting these constraints [10–”
Recursion relations for conformal blocks (2015, methodology): “The conformal bootstrap program [2, 3] is a non-perturbative approach to the construction of interacting conformal field theories (CFT), which has made remarkable progress in recent years since the pioneering work of [4].”
Universality of long-distance AdS physics from the CFT bootstrap (2014, methodology): “in scattering theory is indicated in Figure 3. These singularities 3 For readers unfamiliar with the conformal bootstrap, we give a brief overview in section 3.1. For a more thorough review, see e.g. [3]. 5 occur in the limit x2 12 !0, which is often referred to as a \light-cone" limit since th”
Spinning conformal blocks (2011, background): “For example, it would be extremely interesting to pursue the conformal bootstrap program for four point functions of these important operators, perhaps following the lines of [3–7].”
Carving out OPE space and precise O(2) model critical exponents (2019, methodology): “Given the crossing equations (17), we compute bounds on CFT quantities in the standard way described in [1, 5].”
Large spin systematics in CFT (2015, positive): “Much of this interest is due to the effectiveness of the conformal bootstrap program [1].”
The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS (2016, methodology): “Furthermore, we have shown above that the modern bootstrap methods of [3] allow us to successfully extract this information and translate it into precise upper bounds.”
Emergent spacetime and holographic CFTs (2011, methodology): “See [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73] for recent work were the unitarity of the CFT in d > 2 was used to derive certain constraints for the data ∆i, Cijk, in special cases.”
The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs (2015, background): “[71], the following bound was derived d[O(2) S ] ≤ f(d) , (2.”
On the CFT operator spectrum at large global charge (2015, methodology): “2 For progress on the simple 3D conformal theories using modern bootstrap methods, see for example [11–15].”