Eight challenges for interview researchers

By Jonathan Potter, A. Hepburn. 2012

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Our aim in this chapter is to make the case that interviewing has been too easy, too obvious, too little studied, and too open to providing a convenient launch pad for poor research. We will argue that interview research will be made better if it faces up to a series of eight challenges that arise in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of qualitative interviews. Some research studies already face up to some of these challenges; few studies face up to all of them. We will make our case strongly and bluntly with the aim of provoking debate where not enough has taken place. These challenges are overlapping, but we have separated them in the way we have for clarity. It is important to emphasize that our aim is not to criticize interviews but to make them better.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0eab2a74bbf76fd4dce19cbb26739704536b01ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Shelton
2. K. Roulston

Citations in the corpus

• Reconceptualizing Bias in Teaching Qualitative Research Methods (2015, background): “(Potter & Hepburn, 2012) As an example, Stephanie closely re-examined the coconstruction of data in an interview that had gone well.”