Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technological change

By Reyer Gerlagh, Bob van der Zwaan. 2003

166 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ea9293311c4add955432aed5348bedbe0849d51

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Mitigation Costs in a Globalized World: Climate Policy Analysis with REMIND-R (2010, unknown): “++49/331/288-2556, e-mail: leimbach@pik-potsdam.de”
The impact of technological change on climate protection and welfare: Insights from the model MIND (2005, background): “All models that include learning-by-doing find large welfare gains from induced technological change (Chakravorty et al., 1997; Goulder and Mathai, 2002; Manne and Richels, this volume; Gerlagh and van der Zwaan, 2003).”
Endogenous Induced Technical Change and the Costs of Kyoto (2003, unknown): “The issue of endogenous technical change is tackled in this paper by following the ideas contained in both Nordhaus (1999) and Goulder and Mathai (2000) and accordingly modifying Nordhaus and Yang’s (1996) regional RICE model of integrated assessment. As specified below, doing so requires the input ”
The empirical analysis of the determinants for environmental technological change: A research agenda (2009, background): “(see, for example, Gerlagh and van der Zwaan, 2003 and”
Environment, Directed Technical Change and Economic Policy (2008, background): “The social planner maximizes U subject to the modified versions of (1), (2) and (3), and ( 4 ), (5), (6), (7) and (8).”
Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage (2009, methodology): “…der Zwaan 2006) we analysed the types of economic instruments that can be used to address the problem of climate change, as well as the incentives available to induce technical change towards physical emission reduction options like CCS, in a way similar to the work by Fischer and Newell (2004).”
Carbon taxes: a drop in the ocean, or a drop that erodes the stone? The effect of carbon taxes on technological change (2005, background): “ITC is a more prominent factor in a context with multiple competing energy sources (Van der Zwaan et al., 2002; Gerlagh and Van der Zwaan, 2003; Gerlagh, 2003) and such a context would also be in line with many so-called Integrated Assessment Models that pay more attention to the energy system (e.”
Targets for global climate policy: an overview (2013, background): “Calibrated models show that learning-by-doing does not have much effect on the optimal emission reduction trajectory (Bosetti et al., 2006; Gerlagh and van der Zwaan, 2003).”
Mitigation from a cross-sectoral perspective (2007, unknown): “Something between full and partial crowding-out appears more recently in Gerlagh and Lise (2005). Goulder and Matthai (2000) provide an example of the importance for cost reduction of parameters describing returns from R&D and capacity for innovation.”